... ...

Case Study: How a Global Manufacturer Cut Picking Time by 42% Using Generic HU Warehouse Tasks in SAP EWM

Faster EWM Picking

A leading global manufacturer was struggling with a silent productivity killer: slow, inconsistent, and unsafe pallet picking during production staging. SAP EWM was automatically selecting source HUs and bins—even when those pallets were physically inaccessible.

The result?

  • Operators wasting time searching for pallets
  • Unnecessary forklift movements
  • Re-stacking and re-handling
  • Production delays and safety risks
Outcome: After implementing a Generic HU Picking strategy, the company achieved:
• 42% faster staging cycles
• Zero pallet re-handling
• 100% operator flexibility
• Full pallets only — no partial picks, no confusion

This case study explains the exact configuration, logic, and business impact behind this transformation.

The Business Problem

The manufacturer needed to pick full Handling Units (HUs), each containing 5 EA of product. But SAP EWM’s standard behavior created three major issues:

1. System-selected HU was often physically inaccessible

EWM proposed a specific HU and bin, but in reality:

  • The HU might be at the bottom of a stack
  • It might be blocked by other pallets
  • It might require extra forklift movements

This caused delays, congestion, and safety hazards.

2. Operators needed flexibility

They wanted to pick any pallet that was easiest to access, not the one the system forced.

3. Partial pallets were not allowed

The business required:

  • Full pallet picking only
  • No partial pallet removal
  • No leftover half-pallets in bulk storage
Key Insight: The company needed a solution where SAP EWM created a generic warehouse task—allowing operators to choose the HU physically while still enforcing full-pallet logic.

The Goal

The solution needed to ensure:

  • WT contains only the storage type (no HU, no bin)
  • Operator chooses the HU physically
  • System rounds up to full pallet multiples
  • No partial pallets are ever picked

Solution Overview

The company implemented a combination of:

  • Storage Type configuration
  • Warehouse Process Type logic
  • Quantity classification
  • Pallet-level master data

This created a fully flexible, operator-friendly picking process—without any custom code.

Business Benefit: Operators pick the pallet that is easiest to access, while SAP ensures full-pallet accuracy.

Configuration Breakdown

1. Storage Type Configuration

  • Level of Available Quantity = “Storage Bin”
    Prevents EWM from drilling down to HU level.
  • WT Generic = “2 – Only Storage Type”
    Ensures WT contains only the storage type—no HU, no bin, no source proposal.

This is the foundation of operator-driven HU selection.

2. Warehouse Process Type (WPT) Configuration

  • Round Whole Unit = “4 – Round Up WT Quantity to a Multiple of a Unit”
    Ensures full pallet picking only.
  • Control for HU Pick = “1 – Propose Source HU as Destination HU”
  • Select HU Without Storage Process
    Allows HU selection without storage process steps.

3. Master Data Requirements

  • Product Master: Quantity Classification = “4 – Pallet”
  • Pallet AUoM maintained
  • Packaging Specification for Pallet
    Defines pallet quantity (5 EA) and operative UoM.

How the System Works (Real Example)

Scenario:

  • PMR requirement: 8 EA
  • Pallet size: 5 EA

System Logic:

  1. PMR requests 8 EA
  2. Rounding rule applies → round up to full pallet multiple
  3. Nearest multiple = 10 EA (2 pallets)
  4. System creates 1 WT for 10 EA
  5. WT contains only the storage type
  6. Operator chooses any 2 pallets
Outcome: No partial pallets. No system-selected HU. Operator picks the easiest pallet. Staging becomes faster and safer.

Business Impact

1. 42% Faster Picking & Staging

Operators no longer waste time searching for the “system-selected” HU.

2. Zero Re-Handling

No more rearranging pallets or unnecessary forklift movements.

3. Improved Safety

Less movement = fewer risks.

4. Cleaner Inventory

Full pallets only → no half pallets → predictable inventory.

5. Higher Production Reliability

Staging becomes predictable, fast, and operator-friendly.

Why This Case Study Matters

This configuration is a hidden gem in SAP EWM. Many warehouses struggle with:

  • System-driven HU selection
  • Partial pallet issues
  • Slow staging
  • Operator frustration

This solution solves all of them—without a single line of custom code.

Pro Tip: This strategy works exceptionally well in bulk storage, high-turnover materials, and fast-moving production environments.

Conclusion

By combining:

  • Generic WT creation
  • Storage-type-only source determination
  • Pallet-level quantity classification
  • Rounding to full pallet multiples

…the manufacturer transformed its production staging process.

This case study demonstrates how smart SAP EWM configuration can deliver:

  • Faster operations
  • Higher productivity
  • Better safety
  • Cleaner inventory
  • Happier operators
Next Step: Learn how to configure MF60, PSA staging, and advanced EWM strategies to optimize your warehouse.

Explore SAP EWM Guides →

Share this guide:LinkedInFacebook𝕏 Post
Join the discussion

Enjoying these SAP guides? 🚀 Support the site with a $5 coffee to keep them free! Support via Stripe 🔒

LG Logistics Experts Ltd

Registered in England & Wales (No: 13409501)

Quality Assurance: This blueprint has been reviewed for technical accuracy by our consulting team. Content is aligned with SAP S/4HANA Best Practices for global logistics implementations.

Editorial Policy →